000			03645nam a22005655i 4500
003			DE-He213
005			20191011031046.0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			100301s2007 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020	6	4	_a9781402062049 _9978-1-4020-6204-9
024	8	7	_a10.1007/978-1-4020-6204-9 _2doi
050	8	4	_aBD300-450
072	8	7	_aHPJ _2bicssc
072	8	7	_aPHI013000 _2bisacsh
082			_a111 _223
100	8	1	_aCocchiarella, Nino B. _eauthor. _944058
245	9	7	_aFormal Ontology and Conceptual Realism _h[electronic resource] / _cby Nino B. Cocchiarella.
001			000049738
300	6	4	_aXXIV, 332 p. _bonline resource.
490	8	1	_aSynthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science ; _v339
505	8	0	_aFormal Ontology -- Formal Ontology and Conceptual Realism -- Time, Being, and Existence -- Logical Necessity and Logical Atomism -- Formal Theories of Predication -- Formal Theories of Predication Part II -- Intensional Possible Worlds -- Conceptual Realism -- The Nexus of Predication -- Medieval Logic and Conceptual Realism -- On Geach Against General Reference -- Le?niewskis Ontology -- Plurals and the Logic of Classes as Many -- The Logic of Natural Kinds.
520	6	4	_aTheories about the ontological structure of the world have generally been described in informal, intuitive terms, and the arguments for and against them, including their consistency and adequacy as explanatory frameworks, have generally been given in even more informal terms. The goal of formal ontology is to correct for these deficiencies. By formally reconstructing an intuitive, informal ontological scheme as a formal ontology we can better determine the consistency and adequacy of that scheme; and then by comparing different reconstructed schemes with one another we can much better evaluate the arguments for and against them and come to a decision as to which system it is best to adopt. Conceptual realism, which is defended here as the best system to adopt, contains both an intensional and a natural realism as well as an Aristotelian essentialism based on a logic of natural kinds. "This book is a significant contribution to the field of formal ontology, and to analytical ontology in general - it presents an original and powerful systematic position with a host of important technical results." Johanna Seibt, University of Aarhus, Denmark
650	8	0	_aPhilosophy (General). _944059
650	8	0	_aLogic. _917095
650	8	0	_aPhilosophy, medieval. _937695
650	8	0	_aMetaphysics. _944060
650	8	0	_aOntology. _915657
650	8	0	_aLinguistics _xPhilosophy. _935343
650	8	0	_aComputer science. _944061
650			_aPhilosophy. _98556
650			_aOntology. _915657
650			_aLogic. _917095
650			_aPhilosophy of Language. _935345
650			_aMedieval Philosophy. _937696
650			_aMathematical Logic and Formal Languages. _910185
650			_aMetaphysics. _944060
710	8	2	_aSpringerLink (Online service) _944062
773	8	0	_tSpringer eBooks
776			_iPrinted edition: _z9781402062032
830	8	0	_aSynthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science ; _v339 _944063
856			_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6204-9 _zde clik aquí para ver el libro electrónico
264	8	1	_aDordrecht : _bSpringer Netherlands, _c2007.
336	6	4	_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337	6	4	_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338	6	4	_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347	6	4	_atext file _bPDF _2rda
516	6	4	_aZDB-2-SHU
999			_c49467 _d49467
942			_c05